![]() |
Gateway | About SBIR/STTR | MoTIP | About Us | Partners | Centers/Staff |
|
| MoFAST - Missouri Federal and State Technology Partnership |
Thursday, August 21, 2008
|
||
Sunny Graphics
Sample - Profit Indirect Cost Rate Proposal
FYE 12/31/00
|
Elimina- |
Indirect |
Direct |
Project A |
Project B |
Project C |
(4) |
||
|
Salaries & Wages |
Total |
tions |
Costs |
Costs |
NSF |
DOE |
NASA |
IR&D |
| B. Able, President |
70,000 |
25,000 |
45,000 |
15,000 |
5,000 |
15,000 |
10,000 |
|
|
J. Brue, Sr. Scientist |
65,000 |
15,200 |
49,800 |
23,800 |
10,000 |
8,000 |
8,000 |
|
|
P. Dent, Engineer |
60,000 |
4,800 |
55,200 |
0 |
40,000 |
10,000 |
5,200 |
|
|
C. Kipe, Scientist |
50,000 |
4,000 |
46,000 |
30,000 |
12,000 |
4,000 |
||
|
S. Smith, Typist |
30,000 |
12,400 |
17,600 |
10,000 |
6,000 |
1,000 |
600 |
|
|
M. Jones, Accounting |
45,000 |
45,000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
Total Salaries & Wages |
320,000 |
106,400 |
213,600 |
78,800 |
73,000 |
34,000 |
27,800 |
|
|
(3) |
(B) |
|||||||
| FICA |
24,480 |
24,480 |
||||||
|
Health Insurance |
28,000 |
28,000 |
||||||
|
Consultant Fees |
49,000 |
3,000 |
46,000 |
13,000 |
27,000 |
3,750 |
2,250 |
|
|
Depreciation |
10,000 |
10,000 |
||||||
|
Entertainment/Penalties |
3,500 |
3,500 |
||||||
|
Equipment |
23,000 |
23,000 |
||||||
|
Legal & Accounting |
5,000 |
5,000 |
||||||
|
Materials & Supplies |
20,000 |
1,500 |
8,500 |
9,400 |
2,500 |
900 |
5,700 |
|
|
Office Supplies |
2,000 |
2,000 |
||||||
|
Computer Services |
6,500 |
1,000 |
5,500 |
4,500 |
1,000 |
|||
|
Postage & Telephone |
1,500 |
1,500 |
||||||
|
Printing & Publication |
3,000 |
400 |
2,600 |
1,400 |
700 |
500 |
||
|
Rent |
12,000 |
12,000 |
||||||
|
Utilities |
2,400 |
2,400 |
||||||
|
Travel |
6,000 |
600 |
5,400 |
3,600 |
800 |
750 |
250 |
|
|
Subawards |
95,000 |
95,000 |
||||||
|
Total Expenses |
611,380 |
121,500 |
198,280 |
291,600 |
110,700 |
105,000 |
39,900 |
36,000 |
|
|
(1) |
(2) |
(A) |
(C) |
|
Indirect Cost Pool (divided by) |
(A)
|
198,280
|
|
| Salaries and Wages Distribution Base |
(B)
|
213,600
|
= 92.8%
|
|
OR
|
|||
| Indirect Cost Pool (divided by) |
(A)
|
198,280
|
|
| Modified Total Direct Cost Distribution Base |
(C)
|
291,600
|
= 68.0%
|
|
(1) |
Indirect cost proposal should be based on actual cost data for the most current ended accounting year and should be submitted with the financial statements (F/S) for that year. The total amount of expenses per the indirect cost proposal should be reconciled to the total expenses reported in the F/S. A second “budgeted” indirect cost proposal(s) should be provided if it is expected that the indirect cost rate will change significantly during the actual period of the award (if covering more than one acounting year, a proposal should be provided for each year). Where projected costs in any particular cost category have significantly increased, an explanation for the increase should be provided. |
|
|
(2) |
Both direct costs and indirect costs shall exclude capital expenditures. Unallowable costs are also excluded, unless they 1) include the salaries of personnel, 2) occupy space, and (3) benefit from the organization’s indirect costs; in which case they are included as a direct cost (see applicable cost principles which identify other unallowable costs). Distorting items such as subawards and participant support costs should be excluded from the distribution base. |
|
|
(3) |
Fringe benefits, including FICA, non-work time, health, etc., in this example are included in the indirect cost pool and therefore would not be proposed as a separate direct cost element. (Although not separately itemized, vacation, holiday and sick are included in the indirect salaries and wages amounts in this example.) It can be appropriate, however, to segregate fringe type costs and allocate these costs to direct and indirect salary and wage categories in determining total indirect and direct amounts. It would then be appropriate to propose fringe benefits as a separate rate applied to direct salaries and wages. |
|
| (4) |
NSF does not fund Independent Research and Development
(IR&D) costs either directly or indirectly. Therefore, while IR&D
should not be proposed as direct costs, these costs must be treated
as a direct cost in indirect cost rate calculations.
|
|
| Courtesy: National Science Foundation |
| Home | Sitemap | About | FAQ | Search | Help | Privacy | Contact Us | ||
| A part of the University
of Missouri's business development program © 2008 Curators of the University of Missouri. bdpwebmaster@umsystem.edu |
||