New Performance Management System
Replacing Annual Performance Review
Performance appraisal was once the unquestioned way of conducting an
annual employee evaluation, the familiar ritual in which employees and
managers met to review the employee's performance during the year. If
the employees were lucky, they walked away with raises, often tied to
a ranking on some sort of rigid, numerical scale. Nobody really liked
the process, but in the old command-and-control style of organizational
leadership, this seemed like a perfectly appropriate model for measuring
performance. But todaywith widespread emphasis on teamwork, shared
leadership, and an ongoing struggle to find and retain qualified employeesit's
a model that is falling increasingly out of favor.
Yet if companies don't do annual performance reviews, what will take
their place? More and
more, organizations are turning to systems of performance management.
Instead of measuring employees' performance and pointing out where they
fall short, organizations are discovering they can achieve more results
by finding ways to fine-tune and improve their systems. Some of the
major changes between the old appraisal system and the new performance
management system are highlighted in the chart below:
|
Performance Appraisal
|
Performance Management
|
| Appraisal/Evaluation |
Planning, Coaching Appraisal & Professional Development |
| Backward Look |
Forward Look |
| Once a Year |
More Frequent |
| Paper-Driven |
Communication-Driven |
The easiest way to begin using a performance management system is to
have all members of your organization answer the following questions:
1. What are my major work priorities?
This will help employees identify the "Key Result Areas"
of their job. This is not a listing of everything they do, but typically
4 to 6 major contributions their supervisor/employer expects from
them during the next 6 to 12 months.
2. How will I know I have accomplished those priorities?
For what outcomes or products will each employee be accountable in
each "Key Result Area"? This is typically the end resultsomething
the employees will create or achieve through the work they do.
3. What will I have to do to get there?
What major activities or tasks must the employees doand by what
datesto achieve the outcome or create the product?
4. How will the work I do fit in with my organization's strategic
plan?
All employees need to understand how they fit into the "Big Picture."
5. If I need help along the way, how can I get it?
What assistance, if any, will your employees need to perform the activities
or tasks they have listed? Are there any professional development
areas they should focus on to help them accomplish their job?
After all employees have answered these questions, they should then
meet with their supervisor to determine how often they should meet to
discuss, monitor and recognize progress on activities, tasks, or outcomes.
For the past two years, New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,
has been making the transition from a traditional performance-appraisal
system to one based on the principles of performance management. At
the beginning of the year, employees and managers set their objectives.
Mid-year and year-end reviews follow.
During the mid-year review, the manager and employee sit down to assess
the objectives set at the beginning of the year. They look at the employee's
progress with an eye toward making any changes necessary to ensure the
ultimate success of the plan. They also update whatever kind of personal
development plan the employee may have in place.
The year-end review integrates feedback from peers, assesses the employee's
progress against business objectives, and identifies the areas in which
the employee needs to improve. Throughout the year, managers are encouraged
to provide ongoing feedback to their employees about their performance.
Send this article to a friend
Authored by: Jackie Rasmussen, Business and Industry
Specialist, University of Missouri Extension
Source: Creating Quality Newsletter, Volume
10, Number 10, October 2001
go
back
Newsletter archives: 2004
| 2003
| 2002
| 2001